[viper1ts]

Originally Posted by VipinLJ

Your map 3 times are impressive! Best I've gotten with map 3 was 13.14s IIRC. But that was a one off. All other runs have been in the 13.2s range.

Is yours an xDrive or RWD? Also, what is your trap speed at the quarter mile? Do you have the EWG connector?

It's RWD, and trap was 104.9.
No EWG yet but I've been following what you've been doing with the custom map and definitely intrigued.

[VipinLJ]

Originally Posted by viper1ts

It's RWD, and trap was 104.9.
No EWG yet but I've been following what you've been doing with the custom map and definitely intrigued.

Yes. Post your logs in the N54tech website and see what Terry and the others say. And then you can go from there. Lots of helpful people there. I'm sure you'll be able to get better numbers than me. And the EWG connector helps too.

[pdbmw]

How reliable is Torque Pro to measure 0 to 60MHP? I have installed RC tuning on Sport mode, running sport+ mode (via Bimmercode) and I've got 4.8s (picture below). It is a little bit cold here (around 24F) but not too slippery.

[vTuga]

Originally Posted by pdbmw

How reliable is Torque Pro to measure 0 to 60MHP? I have installed RC tuning on Sport mode, running sport+ mode (via Bimmercode) and I've got 4.8s (picture below). It is a little bit cold here (around 24F) but not too slippery.

I don't think it's accurate. But I'm curious what the results with a draggy would be. Is that the Race Chip GTS?

[VipinLJ]

Originally Posted by pdbmw

How reliable is Torque Pro to measure 0 to 60MHP? I have installed RC tuning on Sport mode, running sport+ mode (via Bimmercode) and I've got 4.8s (picture below). It is a little bit cold here (around 24F) but not too slippery.

Does torque pro read from a dongle attached to the OBD port? If so, it probably reads the values from the ECU which are inaccurate.

[pdbmw]

Yes, this is a RC GTS. I'm very surprised with the results as I was getting around 5.2s before. I'm going to experiment with changing the settings to 'RACE' mode on the RC to see if there is an improvement. And it is still snowy here - so I expect to at least get a few ms better. I believe torque pro reads from the tablet sensors (Samsung in this case) - so may not be accurate but cannot be off for more than some ms either - I think.

[VipinLJ]

Originally Posted by pdbmw

Yes, this is a RC GTS. I'm very surprised with the results as I was getting around 5.2s before. I'm going to experiment with changing the settings to 'RACE' mode on the RC to see if there is an improvement. And it is still snowy here - so I expect to at least get a few ms better. I believe torque pro reads from the tablet sensors (Samsung in this case) - so may not be accurate but cannot be off for more than some ms either - I think.

Hmmm .I'm not sure. I know my phone GPS readings vary a lot. I've had cases where it says 7.xs in one run and the very next run, it says 4.4xs when nothing has changed. Dragy is extremely accurate. You can't use phone apps for a before and after because of the variation.

[JTYAMSHAYIN]

@VipinLJ curious what's been your quickest time on the custom map with just 93 octane?

[VipinLJ]

Originally Posted by JTYAMSHAYIN

@VipinLJ curious what's been your quickest time on the custom map with just 93 octane?

I don't think I can run my custom map with only 93oct. I'll have timing problems because of the boost and reduced octane rating. Which is why I run ~E25 religiously.
When I can't find any E85 near me (like say, when I'm far away from home and run out of fuel, which happened once), I run map 3 till I get home and fill E85.

With map 3 and 93octane, my car used to do 13.3-13.4s quarter miles and 5.1-5.2s 0-60s.

[vTuga]

Originally Posted by VipinLJ

With map 3 and 93octane, my car used to do 13.3-13.4s quarter miles and 5.1-5.2s 0-60s.

That’s pretty close to my 330e with the ventura box in map 5.

Right now I took the box off to take the car for diagnostics (because of those codes were still there). BMW scanned and tested the car and said everything is fine, the codes must have been temporary and for some reason carly was still showing them. Very nice service from my dealership, charged me nothing and even cleaned and washed the car for free.

[VipinLJ]

Originally Posted by vTuga

That’s pretty close to my 330e with the ventura box in map 5.

Right now I took the box off to take the car for diagnostics (because of those codes were still there). BMW scanned and tested the car and said everything is fine, the codes must have been temporary and for some reason carly was still showing them. Very nice service from my dealership, charged me nothing and even cleaned and washed the car for free.

Did you mail the Ventura guys regarding the codes? My JB4 hasn't thrown any codes except for a few low fuel pressure codes a while back. Cleared those and it went away. I've also taken the car in for service after that, after uninstalling the JB4 and they said my car was clean. No codes and no flagging

[vTuga]

Originally Posted by VipinLJ

Did you mail the Ventura guys regarding the codes? My JB4 hasn't thrown any codes except for a few low fuel pressure codes a while back. Cleared those and it went away. I've also taken the car in for service after that, after uninstalling the JB4 and they said my car was clean. No codes and no flagging

Yes I’ve been in touch with them. At first they told me the codes should be temporary. But then as they didn’t disappear they started to think it might be a fault with the camshaft sensor, and even offered to send me a sensor for me to replace. I decided to first take it to service to confirm the issue, and it came out clean. So no need to replace anything.