Bimmerpost
3
/
4 Series
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos Still want an EV? (NO POLITICS)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-18-2024, 08:57 AM   #7613
Car-Addicted
Colonel
Car-Addicted's Avatar
United_States
8236
Rep
2,377
Posts

Drives: 2020 BMW M4 CS
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Central PA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 BMW M4 CS  [9.91]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan B View Post
I don't own a horse but my Sister and her Husband ride dressage and have 4 currently. Between feed, tack, barn, trailer, tow vehicle, vet bills etc... it is like owning 4 racecars.
I live in horse country and no one out here has their horses on food stamps. Horses may be the king of expensive hobbies
Also Horse women are not inexpensive either.
Appreciate 1
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 09:04 AM   #7614
kyriian
Captain
kyriian's Avatar
963
Rep
717
Posts

Drives: 06 Black Sapphire Z4MR
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Ontario

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 BMW X5  [0.00]
2011 Scion tC  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by murderspice View Post
I want you to find me where exactly in the survey it says chinese people regret EV purchases. Bonus points if you even find the survey.
Page 32, Figure 27, which indicate 54% of owners regret their purchase...

HOWEVER, there is a caveat there, the figure is also skewed.
The 10% of owners who regret their EV purchase are from 'Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities'. I am assuming that's cities like Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing? versus the 54% from Tier 3 & 4. So no suprise there when those are massive metropolis with a well established charging network.

The 54% regret are those EV owners from 'Tier 3 and Tier 4 cities', so smaller towns and villages, the highlighted dashed rectangle below these figures indicate the biggest reason the article identified is that the charging satisfaction between these two groups.
__________________
Revolution of our Times

I will return to the track, one day.
Appreciate 3
      04-18-2024, 09:10 AM   #7615
Car-Addicted
Colonel
Car-Addicted's Avatar
United_States
8236
Rep
2,377
Posts

Drives: 2020 BMW M4 CS
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Central PA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 BMW M4 CS  [9.91]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan B View Post
IMO, EVs are a great idea experiencing a lot of growing pains. 750 mile range and 10 minute charge to go from a 10%-80% charge will be a lot closer to the ICE experience.
I'm in agreement with most of your post but.
"750 mile range and 10 minute charge" The physics behind this don't work. I for one would not want to be around any battery that was charged at a rate that would fulfill that EV prophecy. (BOOM) That said if a safe battery was used and the battery weight was reduced I think a lot of folks would have no issue with with a EV as a second vehicle and maybe their primary vehicle with home charging. I also think a properly designed hybrid will find a large market. Not the pseudo EV with a gas engine being peddled by most companies. I would most likely buy one of those.
Appreciate 2
SteVTEC499.50
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 09:50 AM   #7616
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-Addicted View Post
I live in horse country and no one out here has their horses on food stamps. Horses may be the king of expensive hobbies
Also Horse women are not inexpensive either.
This.

My wife owned a horse for 18 years. I could be retired now if she had a different hobby. If you like to keep your money, DO NOT marry a horse woman (unless she already wealthy).
Appreciate 2
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 09:52 AM   #7617
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Culpeper Killed Superman
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2024, 09:58 AM   #7618
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-Addicted View Post
I'm in agreement with most of your post but.
"750 mile range and 10 minute charge" The physics behind this don't work. I for one would not want to be around any battery that was charged at a rate that would fulfill that EV prophecy. (BOOM) That said if a safe battery was used and the battery weight was reduced I think a lot of folks would have no issue with with a EV as a second vehicle and maybe their primary vehicle with home charging. I also think a properly designed hybrid will find a large market. Not the pseudo EV with a gas engine being peddled by most companies. I would most likely buy one of those.
GM needs to reconstitute its Volt team and build a true series hybrid. Give the engine guys a task to come up with a new ICE architecture specifically for a serial hybrid. There has to be engineers within GM who want to do one.
Appreciate 2
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 10:28 AM   #7619
Car-Addicted
Colonel
Car-Addicted's Avatar
United_States
8236
Rep
2,377
Posts

Drives: 2020 BMW M4 CS
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Central PA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 BMW M4 CS  [9.91]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
GM needs to reconstitute its Volt team and build a true series hybrid. Give the engine guys a task to come up with a new ICE architecture specifically for a serial hybrid. There has to be engineers within GM who want to do one.
I think the new Corvette E-Ray Hybrid is very interesting technology for a start but I would have ZERO faith in Mary Barra doing the right or smart thing.

First Drive: Corvette E-Ray, In-Depth with Chief Engineer
Appreciate 1
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 11:22 AM   #7620
SteVTEC
Captain
SteVTEC's Avatar
500
Rep
618
Posts

Drives: G07,G05,E93
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC burbs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan B View Post
IMO, EVs are a great idea experiencing a lot of growing pains. As the technology improves and infrastructure adapts, they will be the future or personal automobiles.

For example, if Toyota can deliver on their battery timeline, and it does not require some special charger infrastructure, it could be a game changer. 750 mile range and 10 minute charge to go from a 10%-80% charge will be a lot closer to the ICE experience. I have NOT read how solid state batteries respond to extreme heat or cold so that could have an impact.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4...battery-plans/

With all that said, there is a lot of ancillary work that needs to be done and all of that requires time and money.
I read this and it's very interesting, but you can see they have the cost labeled as TBD for their solid states. It's NOT going to be inexpensive or a cheaper option. That's not how technology works. The way I see it, we're several generations away from EV's truly being able to replace ICE. You need the claimed capabilities of the solid state batteries, but at prices *cheaper* than today because most cannot even afford EV's. They're a tough sell and will continue to be.
__________________
2022 G07 X7 Tanzanite Blue / Ivory White | 2022 G05 X5 40i Phytonic Blue / Ivory | 2011 E93 335i Deep Sea Blue / Oyster
2018 Chevy Suburban (ret) | 2012 E70 X5d Deep Sea Blue / Sand Beige (ret)
Appreciate 2
      04-18-2024, 11:26 AM   #7621
SteVTEC
Captain
SteVTEC's Avatar
500
Rep
618
Posts

Drives: G07,G05,E93
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC burbs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Man View Post
Why spend that money when hybrid are banned right along with pure ICE? Toyota is basically praying that sanity returns to the room, big bet.
I think Toyota had it right 25 years ago with their hybrid technology, and that they still have it right today continuing to lean on both hybrids and now their PHEV's. Lots of manufacturers are going to lose billions of dollars on EV's that they can't sell, but not Toyota.
__________________
2022 G07 X7 Tanzanite Blue / Ivory White | 2022 G05 X5 40i Phytonic Blue / Ivory | 2011 E93 335i Deep Sea Blue / Oyster
2018 Chevy Suburban (ret) | 2012 E70 X5d Deep Sea Blue / Sand Beige (ret)
Appreciate 1
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 11:32 AM   #7622
SteVTEC
Captain
SteVTEC's Avatar
500
Rep
618
Posts

Drives: G07,G05,E93
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC burbs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-Addicted View Post
What China’s EV buyers’ remorse means for the world
Apr 12, 2024
China is the most important country in the world when it comes to the future of electric vehicles: It accounts for about 60% of all global EV sales, its market for EVs is surging, and it is home to the planet’s biggest EV manufacturer.
Alongside that remarkable growth, however, has been frustration: The survey from McKinsey China pegged battery EV buyers’ “regret rate” as surging from 3% in 2022 to 22% last year, which its report blamed largely on limited charging infrastructure.
Early adopters of EVs were often more affluent, curious, and well-researched on the topic. But as the market has ballooned, consumers quickly shifted from trailblazers to more everyday users, who may be less prepared for challenges associated with EVs, he said.
https://www.semafor.com/article/04/1...-for-the-world
Anecdotal data point, but there's definitely EV regret here in the affluent D.C. suburbs.

When they first came out, I started to see the Ford Mach-E just about everywhere. There were TONS of them on the road almost overnight, and people were buying them like crazy. Now I hardly see a single one. The big issue here is lack of infrastructure for anything other than Tesla's. Just for curiosity's sake I checked reviews for some of the other non-Tesla public charging stations in the area, and most of them don't work at all, and are constantly broken and needing to be repaired. So unless you're home charging, you're screwed. I'm sure Ford quality and recalls and software issues didn't help, but people very clearly and quickly unloaded these things over a year or so. Plenty of Tesla's here, though.

I have no problems with EV's, but you have to have the infrastructure to support them, and nobody wants a vehicle that's going to blow up in your face, metaphorically or for real.
__________________
2022 G07 X7 Tanzanite Blue / Ivory White | 2022 G05 X5 40i Phytonic Blue / Ivory | 2011 E93 335i Deep Sea Blue / Oyster
2018 Chevy Suburban (ret) | 2012 E70 X5d Deep Sea Blue / Sand Beige (ret)
Appreciate 2
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 11:56 AM   #7623
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Man View Post
Why spend that money when hybrid are banned right along with pure ICE? Toyota is basically praying that sanity returns to the room, big bet.
In the weeds, but it's just Cali that has a limitation on how many percent of sales a ICE-Hybrid can be used to meet the Zero-Emissions mandate (by 2035). It's just 20%. The other 19 or so states that adopted Cali's CARB standards can choose whether or not to continue to be a CARB-Regulated state. Hopefully the other states citizens will begin to pay attention to what their Lawmakers are doing to their transportation choices and push back on CARB mandates.

Perhaps the pending EPA emissions regs proposed by the current administration will drive development of cleaner, more efficient ICE to power a true series hybrid. It won't happen in my driving lifetime, but I'd happily give up my manual transmission fettish for a true (pure) serial hybrid. I love the EV drivetrain from an engeering and energy usage perspective, I just think carrying around a huge, slow charging, heavy battery to power it is stupid.
Appreciate 2
      04-18-2024, 12:00 PM   #7624
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteVTEC View Post
Anecdotal data point, but there's definitely EV regret here in the affluent D.C. suburbs.

When they first came out, I started to see the Ford Mach-E just about everywhere. There were TONS of them on the road almost overnight, and people were buying them like crazy. Now I hardly see a single one. The big issue here is lack of infrastructure for anything other than Tesla's. Just for curiosity's sake I checked reviews for some of the other non-Tesla public charging stations in the area, and most of them don't work at all, and are constantly broken and needing to be repaired. So unless you're home charging, you're screwed. I'm sure Ford quality and recalls and software issues didn't help, but people very clearly and quickly unloaded these things over a year or so. Plenty of Tesla's here, though.

I have no problems with EV's, but you have to have the infrastructure to support them, and nobody wants a vehicle that's going to blow up in your face, metaphorically or for real.
Now that Ford has adopted the NACS and offeres an adapter (for free thru June 30th) the Mach E owners are all wetting themselves over access to the Tesla network. Even though most HATE Elon Musk for his eX's (err... Tweets).
Appreciate 1
      04-18-2024, 12:02 PM   #7625
SteVTEC
Captain
SteVTEC's Avatar
500
Rep
618
Posts

Drives: G07,G05,E93
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC burbs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
In the weeds, but it's just Cali that has a limitation on how many percent of sales a ICE-Hybrid can be used to meet the Zero-Emissions mandate (by 2035). It's just 20%. The other 19 or so states that adopted Cali's CARB standards can choose whether or not to continue to be a CARB-Regulated state. Hopefully the other states citizens will begin to pay attention to what their Lawmakers are doing to their transportation choices and push back on CARB mandates.

Perhaps the pending EPA emissions regs proposed by the current administration will drive development of cleaner, more efficient ICE to power a true series hybrid. It won't happen in my driving lifetime, but I'd happily give up my manual transmission fettish for a true (pure) serial hybrid. I love the EV drivetrain from an engeering and energy usage perspective, I just think carrying around a huge, slow charging, heavy battery to power it is stupid.
That right there is the core of the issue. The heavier your vehicle, the MORE energy it's consuming. You can't cheat physics, and pulling from the grid isn't more efficient than what a hybrid can already deliver on today. Here in Maryland I have zero hope for sanity returning, but we only have a little over 3 years left here before we move on.
__________________
2022 G07 X7 Tanzanite Blue / Ivory White | 2022 G05 X5 40i Phytonic Blue / Ivory | 2011 E93 335i Deep Sea Blue / Oyster
2018 Chevy Suburban (ret) | 2012 E70 X5d Deep Sea Blue / Sand Beige (ret)
Appreciate 2
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 12:51 PM   #7626
Dan B
Captain
519
Rep
640
Posts

Drives: 2024 M440i xDrive Gran Coupe
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Chicago NW Suburbs

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-Addicted View Post
I'm in agreement with most of your post but.
"750 mile range and 10 minute charge" The physics behind this don't work. I for one would not want to be around any battery that was charged at a rate that would fulfill that EV prophecy. (BOOM) That said if a safe battery was used and the battery weight was reduced I think a lot of folks would have no issue with with a EV as a second vehicle and maybe their primary vehicle with home charging. I also think a properly designed hybrid will find a large market. Not the pseudo EV with a gas engine being peddled by most companies. I would most likely buy one of those.
Please provide a reference for why you say it won't work. No offense and I am making an assumption (with all the possible pitfalls understood) that the Toyota engineers are not speaking out of their ass. They have working prototypes that have not blown up and killed them.

Here is an interesting paper from 2 years ago that talks about charging rates, lifecycle, safety etc..

https://seas.harvard.edu/news/2022/0...rs-solid-state

Also, equivalent density SS batteries weigh about 1/3 of a Li-Ion. That will make a difference in efficiency and safety.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteVTEC View Post
I read this and it's very interesting, but you can see they have the cost labeled as TBD for their solid states. It's NOT going to be inexpensive or a cheaper option. That's not how technology works. The way I see it, we're several generations away from EV's truly being able to replace ICE. You need the claimed capabilities of the solid state batteries, but at prices *cheaper* than today because most cannot even afford EV's. They're a tough sell and will continue to be.
I agree, early tech is always more expensive. You have to pay to be an early adopter. When the technology becomes mainstream prices typically normalize.
Appreciate 2
      04-18-2024, 01:08 PM   #7627
SteVTEC
Captain
SteVTEC's Avatar
500
Rep
618
Posts

Drives: G07,G05,E93
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DC burbs

iTrader: (0)

I would trust Toyota to "get it right", I just know for a fact that they're not going to be inexpensive. Just a guess, but I think you're far more likely to see this battery technology deployed in some $200k exotic first, like a hypothetical "LFA EV," where every bit of range and performance counts. Then, once they can ramp it and bring costs down, it will finally find its way into lower and middle tier consumer transportation appliance type vehicles.
__________________
2022 G07 X7 Tanzanite Blue / Ivory White | 2022 G05 X5 40i Phytonic Blue / Ivory | 2011 E93 335i Deep Sea Blue / Oyster
2018 Chevy Suburban (ret) | 2012 E70 X5d Deep Sea Blue / Sand Beige (ret)
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2024, 01:46 PM   #7628
murderspice
Banned
939
Rep
545
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW M2
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Up in your dms

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Car-Addicted View Post
I live in horse country and no one out here has their horses on food stamps. Horses may be the king of expensive hobbies
Also Horse women are not inexpensive either.
In 1900, i could buy 6.6 solid horses (or 100! old nags) for the cost of a car; 5.6 once the model t came out. I would much rather have a different horse for each day of the week than be stuck w just a single car. More expensive = bad, full stop.
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2024, 02:09 PM   #7629
murderspice
Banned
939
Rep
545
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW M2
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Up in your dms

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteVTEC View Post
I read this and it's very interesting, but you can see they have the cost labeled as TBD for their solid states. It's NOT going to be inexpensive or a cheaper option. That's not how technology works. The way I see it, we're several generations away from EV's truly being able to replace ICE. You need the claimed capabilities of the solid state batteries, but at prices *cheaper* than today because most cannot even afford EV's. They're a tough sell and will continue to be.
Im thinking most govts are hoping for a battery breakthrough to pull us out of our current transition phase; this era of subsidies is unsustainable. Hopefully we are smart enough.

However, one only needs look at the state of automobiles at the turn of the century to appreciate how far we can bring a technology. Id take a g87 over a model T any day.

With AI helping now? Cars might fit in a backpack one day.
Appreciate 1
gblansten2519.00
      04-18-2024, 02:18 PM   #7630
murderspice
Banned
939
Rep
545
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW M2
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Up in your dms

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Man View Post
Why spend that money when hybrid are banned right along with pure ICE? Toyota is basically praying that sanity returns to the room, big bet.
Nobody is banning shit. If GM approached the US govt with a clean, easily sourced hybrid that required a fraction of the infrastructure and still got 100s+ mpg/range, there is absolutely no doubt our EV attitude would at least be questioned, but likely changed. There are still smart people in this country.
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2024, 02:25 PM   #7631
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by murderspice View Post
The goal was to make you think about how cars introduced countless concepts or ideas that those who rode horses would have never been aware of, or that may not have existed without humanity’s technological advancement; unfortunately, i failed.
I don't know why you keep harping on the topic of horse vs. automobile.

My point has always been the analogy of 19th century pushback on automobiles (assuming by horse users) is not relevant to the question of ICEV vs. EV in the 21st century. Cars (and tractors) were new technology in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. EV is not really new automotive technology, it's just a different fuel source that requires a minor architecture adaptation to the current automobile. In the 19th and early 20th centuries the internal combustion engine was a new technology to get work done at a higher quantity for a lower cost. EV do not provide any technological jump over the ICE-powered automobile in the same manner the automobile (and tractor) did over the horse.

Until 1990 when CARB began forcing the requirement for "zero-emission" vehicles and the made-up associated climate scare meme, the automotive market didn't give a shit about electric cars. The market still wouldn't give a shit about EV if not for legislation first incentivising it and now mandating EV.

The majority of posts in this thread is over the forced adoption of EV by government legislation.

Last edited by Efthreeoh; 04-18-2024 at 02:33 PM..
Appreciate 5
M5Rick69833.00
kyriian962.50
eugenebmw2149.00
sirdaft12245.50
      04-18-2024, 02:29 PM   #7632
M5Rick
General
M5Rick's Avatar
69833
Rep
22,352
Posts

Drives: M5 F10 DCT Gunmetal
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: GB

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
I don't know why you keep harping on the topic of horse vs. automobile.

My point has always been the analogy of 19th century pushback on automobiles (assuming by horse users) is not relevant to the question of ICEV vs. EV in the 21st century. Cars (and tractors) were new technology in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. EV is not really new automotive technology, it's just a different fuel source that requires a minor architecture adaptation to the current automobile. In the 19th and early 20th centuries the internal combustion engine was a new technology to get work done at a higher quantity for a lower cost. EV do not provide any technological jump over the ICE-powered automobile in the same manner the automobile (and tractor) did over the horse.

Until 1990 when CARB began forcing the requirement for "zero-emission" vehicle, the automotive market didn't give a shit about electric cars. The market still wouldn't give a shit about EV if not for legislation first incentivising it and now mandating EV.

The majority of posts in this thread is over the forced adoption of EV by government legislation.
Horses for courses
Appreciate 1
eugenebmw2149.00
      04-18-2024, 02:37 PM   #7633
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19273
Rep
19,764
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by murderspice View Post
Nobody is banning shit. If GM approached the US govt with a clean, easily sourced hybrid that required a fraction of the infrastructure and still got 100s+ mpg/range, there is absolutely no doubt our EV attitude would at least be questioned, but likely changed. There are still smart people in this country.
Right, shit is not being banned, but governments are banning the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels by the internal combustion engine. Googleit.
Appreciate 4
M5Rick69833.00
eugenebmw2149.00
sirdaft12245.50
      04-18-2024, 02:39 PM   #7634
Car-Addicted
Colonel
Car-Addicted's Avatar
United_States
8236
Rep
2,377
Posts

Drives: 2020 BMW M4 CS
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Central PA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2020 BMW M4 CS  [9.91]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan B View Post
Please provide a reference for why you say it won't work. No offense and I am making an assumption (with all the possible pitfalls understood) that the Toyota engineers are not speaking out of their ass. They have working prototypes that have not blown up and killed them.
Back ground: My company sells LiPo's and I have been racing with them for 10 plus years.
The charging of almost any battery is a chemical reaction to store the energy. The rate of charge is limited by numerous factors like the chemical reaction speed and control of heat build up. In RC Racing we use far more sophisticated chargers that monitor individual cells and balance the charge. This is not the case in a EV LiPo battery which balances packs not cells. Fact is the faster you charge a LiPo the greater internal resistance in the cells and the lower capacity and shorter battery life.
Many companies have been saying they have 5min recharging but I have yet to see commercially available prototypes.
A while back I posted an interesting article on a new technology that changed the fluid electrolytes for ICE like recharges.
https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/rele...tomobiles.html

If you have 3-phase current 480V voltage.
A 250 kW V3 Supercharger charges at 300amps
Charges a Tesla Model 3 from 5 to 90 percent in 37 minutes
Appreciate 2
M5Rick69833.00
KRS_SN14807.50
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.




g20
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST