[larrylam646]

Originally Posted by siegester

So it's not as bad as I feared, I can still code this with launcher pro, but new people cannot get it. reach out to someone who does remote coding and they can help.

Also, I had to generate a new diff for 2021.07 as none of the previous value combinations worked. I'll post the new values once my desktop works again

I have not tried this yet and do not know if it will work but perhaps an interim solution for those that do not have an Esys Launcher and need to edit/code their FA/CAFD files to code-in feature(s) of interest, could have a service provide/member edit the feature(s) of interest into your files and allow you to just use Esys (without a Launcher) to code-in?

[krazyed]

Would anybody be kind enough to walk me through how to code independent rear turn signal on 2021 g20 software 03/2021.30. i have esys with launcher pro 3.7.

[larrylam646]

Originally Posted by krazyed

Would anybody be kind enough to walk me through how to code independent rear turn signal on 2021 g20 software 03/2021.30. i have esys with launcher pro 3.7.

I do not know if the TM Launcher has the CAFD mapping to make the FDL coding changes required for your 2021 M340iX....

Perhaps try this (at your own risk)...it works on my 2020 M340iX...

VO Code BDC CAFD5665 ONLY (by right clicking on CAFD5665 and selecting coding) with a modified FA where typeschlussel is changed to the ECE variant of your vehicle. Please note your tail lights will loose its sidemarkers.

If your current typeschussel is 5U93, change it to 5U91....remember to disable Eys Options so that the modified FA is not written to your vehicle.

[cheapengineer]

Originally Posted by siegester

So I had this working on 07.2019 with @larrylam646's values, but I get hyper flashing with those values after being updated to 07.2020. Attached is the new diff of 5665 that I generated between ECE (5U71) and US (5U73). Yellow are unchanged differences from 07.2019, green are new value differences, and red are values that are still different, but have changed. There were a few previously different values that are now the same, and thus are not listed in my sheet. After making these new changes the rear turn signals function independently without hyper-flashing. Maybe these values will help others with the hyper-flashing issues too.

For a more copy/paste friendly version, view the PR I have up for Esys cheats here - https://github.com/packetpilot/bmw-f...0783afcf8f2eb0

How do you get the stock ECE parameters to compare?

[UnknownBeing]

Originally Posted by siegester

Also, I had to generate a new diff for 2021.07 as none of the previous value combinations worked. I'll post the new values once my desktop works again

Were you able to post the updated values after the update?

[siegester]

Originally Posted by UnknownBeing

Were you able to post the updated values after the update?

I forgot all about this. I'll see if I still have the files on the laptop and get them cleaned up

[siegester]

Originally Posted by cheapengineer

How do you get the stock ECE parameters to compare?

I only mess with coding about once a year when my car is updated, thus I don't remember exactly offhand. I'll see if I can find the instructions when I'm not on mobile and link it.

[okankaymak]

Originally Posted by larrylam646

Another method is to just fdl code the differences (that I believe may be related to the tail lights) in BDC_BODY between NA and ECE. If Bimmercode can access the parameters below, try changing to:

17BD FS_BL FS_HW_BL

44ED FH_FREIGABE_PWF_US nicht_aktiv

5665 BFD_L_UE_SPG_SCHUTZ Inactive
5665 BFD_R_UE_SPG_SCHUTZ Inactive
5665 LIC_EDGE_CUTTER_RULE_ASSIGNMENT UNK_PARAM_3
5665 LIC_FEATURE_14 disable
5665 LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_DATA UNK_PARAM_22
5665 LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_INDEX UNK_PARAM_22
5665 LIC_NIVEAU_OVERRIDE_DATA_0 G20_ECE_code1
5665 LIC_NIVEAU_OVERRIDE_INDEX G20_EXE_code2
5665 LIC_VERSION_DATA UNK_PARAM_28
5665 NSL_L_CCM CCM114
5665 NSL_L_UE_SPG_SCHUTZ Active
5665 NSL_R_CCM CCM114
5665 NSL_R_UE_SPG_SCHUTZ Active
5665 TFL_L_CCM CCM116
5665 TFL_R_CCM CCM125

7083 ESS_AKTIVIERUNG_GESCHW wert_01
7083 ESS_AKIVIERUNG_REALE_VERZ wert_01
7083 GEFAHRENBREMSLICHT_TYP bremslicht_blinkend
7083 WB_GB_ENABLE aktiv

Anyone managed to to this? I can't find all of these in bimmercode. If someone figured it out, maybe can do remote coding?

[cheapengineer]

Took delivery of my G20 last week and thanks to this forum and larrylam646, I was able to separate the brake lights from the turn signals.

I used the "Coding-Verfication" in Esys to generate .ncd files for the stock 5665 cafd and for the ECE version of my car (by editing the stock FA, replacing the 3 by 1 for Typeschlussel).

I then used BimmerUtility to compare the differences between the ncd files which gave me the same parameters list as those posted by siegester but with different settings I am on 03/2022.30.

However I had a hunch that not all parameters needed to be changed. I did some research on the acronyms used for each parameters in the 5665 cafd. And only a couple were really related to the rear signal operation.

Below are the parameters that I changed. Everything seems to be working as intended.

LIC_FEATURE_14 enable -> disable
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX G20_US_code2 -> G22_ECE_code2
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_DATA_0 G20_US_code2 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_INDEX G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_DATA G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_VERSION_DATA wert_131… -> wert_711…
LIC_EDGE_CUTTER_RULE_ASSIGNMENT G20_US_code -> G20_ECE_code

Now if you are retrofitting ECE tail lights with a fog light or want brake force operation then you would need to look at the other parameters.

[TTG]

Originally Posted by cheapengineer

Took delivery of my G20 last week and thanks to this forum and larrylam646, I was able to separate the brake lights from the turn signals.

I used the "Coding-Verfication" in Esys to generate .ncd files for the stock 5665 cafd and for the ECE version of my car (by editing the stock FA, replacing the 3 by 1 for Typeschlussel).

I then used BimmerUtility to compare the differences between the ncd files which gave me the same parameters list as those posted by siegester but with different settings I am on 03/2022.30.

However I had a hunch that not all parameters needed to be changed. I did some research on the acronyms used for each parameters in the 5665 cafd. And only a couple were really related to the rear signal operation.

Below are the parameters that I changed. Everything seems to be working as intended.

LIC_FEATURE_14 enable -> disable
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX G20_US_code2 -> G22_ECE_code2
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_DATA_0 G20_US_code2 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_INDEX G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_DATA G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_VERSION_DATA wert_131… -> wert_711…
LIC_EDGE_CUTTER_RULE_ASSIGNMENT G20_US_code -> G20_ECE_code

Now if you are retrofitting ECE tail lights with a fog light or want brake force operation then you would need to look at the other parameters.

Thank You, if those are the only parameters that need to change, bimmer code might be able to handle this as well. I will look into it when I get a chance.

I have only been trying to do this for 3 years without ESYS :-)

[UnknownBeing]

Originally Posted by cheapengineer

LIC_FEATURE_14 enable -> disable
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX G20_US_code2 -> G22_ECE_code2
LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_DATA_0 G20_US_code2 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_INDEX G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_LOG_LAMP_2_PHYS_LAMP_DATA G20_US_code1 -> G20_ECE_code1
LIC_VERSION_DATA wert_131… -> wert_711…
LIC_EDGE_CUTTER_RULE_ASSIGNMENT G20_US_code -> G20_ECE_code

Tried this last night and everything looks good.
I made one tweak to LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX.
I set it to G20_ECE_code1 instead of G22

[okankaymak]

Did you do it with Bimmercode? I have never used esys and I really hope this can be done with bimmercode.

Originally Posted by UnknownBeing

Tried this last night and everything looks good.
I made one tweak to LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX.
I set it to G20_ECE_code1 instead of G22

[UnknownBeing]

Originally Posted by okankaymak

Did you do it with Bimmercode? I have never used esys and I really hope this can be done with bimmercode.

Nope, BimmerUtility & esys

[cheapengineer]

Originally Posted by UnknownBeing

Tried this last night and everything looks good.
I made one tweak to LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX.
I set it to G20_ECE_code1 instead of G22

I took the value from the ECE cafd but I am not even sure if LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_INDEX and LIC_NIVEAU_OVVERRIDE_DATA_0 make any difference. I haven’t tried keeping them on the US setting. I suspect they are related to the brightness of the lights as Larry said there is a difference between US and ECE.

It’s possible that you could get away with changing even less parameters than the list I posted with some trial and error.

[okankaymak]

Originally Posted by TTG

Thank You, if those are the only parameters that need to change, bimmer code might be able to handle this as well. I will look into it when I get a chance.

I have only been trying to do this for 3 years without ESYS :-)

Can you please let us know if you actually managed to do this with Bimmercode?

[TTG]

Originally Posted by okankaymak

Can you please let us know if you actually managed to do this with Bimmercode?

I just tried coding this via Bimmercode.

We can change all above discussed parameters except

LIC_VERSION_DATA wert_131… -> wert_711…

Everything else allows turn signals to be separated but without the correct LIC VERSION DATA, we still get hyper flashing.

Bimmercode allows LIC VERSION DATA to be customized fully but we will need the detailed values out of wert_711

If someone can figure that portion out on bimmercode, I think we are there.

[moproblems]

Originally Posted by TTG

I just tried coding this via Bimmercode.

We can change all above discussed parameters except

LIC_VERSION_DATA wert_131… -> wert_711…

Everything else allows turn signals to be separated but without the correct LIC VERSION DATA, we still get hyper flashing.

Bimmercode allows LIC VERSION DATA to be customized fully but we will need the detailed values out of wert_711

If someone can figure that portion out on bimmercode, I think we are there.

Should be as follows:

71,14,09,02,08,44,06,4F,00,0A,14,02,B4,C8,02,F0,0F ,3E,D4,2C,27,32,03,03,07,02,28,78,3F,EF,16,0C,04,0 A,27,0F,77

[cheapengineer]

Originally Posted by moproblems

Should be as follows:

71,14,09,02,08,44,06,4F,00,0A,14,02,B4,C8,02,F0,0F ,3E,D4,2C,27,32,03,03,07,02,28,78,3F,EF,16,0C,04,0 A,27,0F,77

Didn't post the full values because of the length. Mine are a bit different.

71,14,09,67,08,44,0B,4F,00,0A,14,02,B4,C8,02,F0,0F,3E,D4,2C,27,32,03,0 3,07,02,28,78,3F,EF,16,0C,04,0A,27,0F,77

[okankaymak]

Originally Posted by moproblems

Should be as follows:

71,14,09,02,08,44,06,4F,00,0A,14,02,B4,C8,02,F0,0F ,3E,D4,2C,27,32,03,03,07,02,28,78,3F,EF,16,0C,04,0 A,27,0F,77

Originally Posted by cheapengineer

Didn't post the full values because of the length. Mine are a bit different.

71,14,09,67,08,44,0B,4F,00,0A,14,02,B4,C8,02,F0,0F,3E,D4,2C,27,32,03,0 3,07,02,28,78,3F,EF,16,0C,04,0A,27,0F,77

So which one should we use?

[larrylam646]

Originally Posted by okankaymak

So which one should we use?

I think the Werte values may be dependent on model and CAFD version. Attached are screenshots (BU and EsysX) for my Canadian 2020 M340iX using CAFD5665_13_068_205.

[okankaymak]

Originally Posted by larrylam646

I think the Werte values may be dependent on model and CAFD version. Attached are screenshots (BU and EsysX) for my Canadian 2020 M340iX using CAFD5665_13_068_205.

Thanks for sharing, but I'm really confused now

[ATG_]

Hello,

I followed Larry guide on Page 5. Thank you for this great one!
https://g20.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh...1&postcount=90

I replaced US with EU rear lights and EU switch, added the wire, VO coded 5665 with EU version and set LCE_BEL_LIN_VAR in 7083.
Rear Lights became EU, no errors in ISTA, everything works fine, but there is no reaction on the fog light button (on the dashboard, no fog light switches on).

Is there something else to code? Incorrect wiring? Not working switch?